<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim Sainburg &#124; State College Web Design &#187; Javascript</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/category/javascript/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tim.bramblingdesign.com</link>
	<description>Just another State College Web Design &#124; Brambling Design weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 23:04:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>JQuery Tools and JQuery UI</title>
		<link>http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/2009/06/21/jquery-tools-and-jquery-ui/</link>
		<comments>http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/2009/06/21/jquery-tools-and-jquery-ui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javascript]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/2009/06/21/jquery-tools-and-jquery-ui/"><img align="left" hspace="5" width="150" height="150" src="http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/wp-content/plugins/thumbnail-for-excerpts/tfe_no_thumb.png" class="alignleft wp-post-image tfe" alt="" title="" /></a>I&#8217;ve been looking at two javascript libraries recently that I&#8217;m considering using for and upcoming project. The first, JQuery UI. Which has been around much longer is linked on the JQuery website. The second is a new library called JQuery Tools, created by the maker of the popular flash video player Flowplayer. They both seem [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at two javascript libraries recently that I&#8217;m considering using for and upcoming project. The first, <a href="http://jqueryui.com/">JQuery UI</a>. Which has been around much longer is linked on the <a href="http://jquery.com/">JQuery</a> website. The second is a new library called <a href="http://flowplayer.org/tools/index.html">JQuery Tools</a>, created by the maker of the popular flash video player <a href="http://flowplayer.org/index.html">Flowplayer</a>. They both seem to have their advantages and disadvantages which is what I&#8217;m going to discuss today. The article I&#8217;m writing is &#8216;JQuery Tools <em>and</em> JQuery UI&#8217; because while I&#8217;m comparing them, they both have their purposes, and which one I decide to use isn&#8217;t based on which is better, but which is more appropriate of my current project.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s great about both of these libraries is the ease of use that they both have. They both give you a relatively small file, that makes all of your projects much faster. Rather than have to install multiple different javascript files for one page, all that I have to do is make a add one line of code to import the whole library. What&#8217;s even better is that I don&#8217;t even have to host the files myself. <a href="http://code.google.com/apis/ajaxlibs/documentation/index.html">Google hosts</a> JQuery and JQuery UI, while <a href="http://flowplayer.org/tools/performance.html">JQueryTools.org</a> host JQuery tools. That means that I don&#8217;t have to expend bandwidth, and load times will be much faster.</p>
<p>The obvious advantage of JQuery UI is that it&#8217;s been around longer. It&#8217;s got more support and virtually no bugs. UI has many great feature such as the <a href="http://jqueryui.com/demos/datepicker/">Datepicker</a>. Which would be useful of contact forms (whereas <a href="http://www.bramblingdesign.com/contact.php">previously</a> using MooTools I had to load a whole new javascript file). It&#8217;s also got a few fun little <a href="http://jqueryui.com/demos/effect/">effects</a> which serve very little purpose, to me at least, but look cool. It comes with customizable <a href="http://jqueryui.com/demos/effect/">themes</a>, where you can create your own or use one of the many default themes it has. It really makes the whole experience feel like a desktop application over the traditional static web page.</p>
<p>JQuery Tools does plays more of an enhancement role in user interface. Rather than attempt to change the way the web works, Tools tries to simplify it. Tools comes with a myriad of simplifications to normal JQuery, as demonstrated on the<a href="http://flowplayer.org/tools/demos/index.html"> demo area of it&#8217;s site</a>. Some of the more useful of these to me would be the overlay, the scrollbar, tabs, and the flashembed. It&#8217;s easy to see why this new library has been getting so much attention since it&#8217;s release.</p>
<p>In conclusion, for my next project it looks like I&#8217;ll try out JQuery Tools. Tools has may of the design enhancements that could be useful in this project, whereas UI would be better suited being used in a larger, more structured website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tim.bramblingdesign.com/2009/06/21/jquery-tools-and-jquery-ui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

